In the perpetual debate about whether humans are good, greed scored another point.
Researchers in Europe and North America invented a game in which players had to cooperate to receive both individual cash and a reward for achieving a public-good – the example used was avoiding climate change. The longer players were willing to wait for their pay-off, the bigger the reward.
But their research report, published in the peer-reveiewed journal Nature Climate Change, shows that while many individual players opted for the generational reward, achieving it required cooperation – and none of the groups met that goal.
Log in first to read the Science dispatch: Are Humans too selfish to fix climate change? Dispatches are accessible with a $1 day pass for the entire site, or by subscription.