Tag Archives: Greenpeace

Opinion: From Lima, a Munich moment — Chris Wood

Protesters filled Lima streets in the Climate March on December 10. Photo by (Enrique Cuneo/AP Images for AVAAZ, © Avaaz.org

Protesters filled Lima streets in the Climate March on December 10. Photo by Enrique Cuneo/AP Images for AVAAZ, © Avaaz.org

By Chris Wood, NATURAL SECURITY opinion columnist   

There’s no pleasure in saying, ‘I told you so,” over the Lima climate conference. Unhappily, I did. International delegates meeting in the Peruvian capital reached a beyond-last-minute ‘agreement’ on reducing climate-disruptive greenhouse emissions by, in essence, kicking all the hard goals down the road and leaving the maximum possible room for fudging the numbers later.

Class warriors for the North’s wealthy have already dismissed the failure to reach a deal to secure the climate as inconsequential (because, you know, the science isn’t ‘settled’), and blamed it on the poor (and, by implication in their Randian world-view, undeserving) countries’ underhanded desire to transfer their patrons’ assets to the South.

There is enough of a grain of truth to this charge to sell it holus bolus to those inclined to believe it anyway. The poor countries of the world do want the financial help of the rich to deal with the ravages being wreaked on their populations and economies by a destabilizing climate.

What the yawping apologists for plutocracy overlook, of course, is that much of the North’s wealth has come at the cost of depredation in the global South (I give you the Canadian mining industry abroad as Exhibit A), and that virtually all of the instability, volatility and rising violence of the climate, is down to our fossil fuel addiction.

But never mind. Lincoln was only partly right; Goering—in this—was closer to the mark. You only need to be able to fool enough of the people, and the right ones, long enough, to bring them “to the bidding of the leaders” And that, the Nazi Reichsmarschell added, “is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked.”

This will wind up the same way for the ecologically over-leveraged human race as Goering’s politics did for Germany: with cities in ruins and ragged survivors haunting the countryside for food.

Probably this will not be the end of the human story. It is evident, if hardly equitable, that some places are more resilient than others against the collapse of natural security. Resistances are forming. But we have passed a Munich moment.

Copyright Chris Wood 2014

Further reading:

Lima Accord announced on climate, F&O Frontlines update

Chris Wood’s NATURAL SECURITY column

 

If you value our journalism, please help sustain us by buying a day pass or subscription. Facts and Opinions is an online journal of first-rate reporting and analysis, in words and images: choice journalism, without borders. Independent, non-partisan and employee-owned, F&O performs journalism for citizens, funded entirely by readers. We do not carry advertising or solicit donations from foundations or causes.

Click here to purchase a $1 day pass or subscription, from $2.95 per month to $19.95 annually. Subscribe by email using the form on the right to our free FRONTLINES blog. Find news in REPORTS; commentary, analysis, magazine and arts writing in OPINION/FEATURES, and image galleries in PHOTO-ESSAYS.  Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and check our Contents page for regular updates.

 

 

Posted in Current Affairs Also tagged , , |

Lima Accord announced on climate

Blue Marble

Every country would be required to submit a plan to reduce greenhouse gas emissions under the Lima Accord announced Sunday at global climate talks in Peru.

The Lima talks aimed to set ground rules for a global climate deal between world leaders meeting late next year in Paris. That deal would kick in after 2020. Negotiators representing 196 counties talked in Lima about adaptation and resilience, boosting a “Green” global fund, and emissions. Their agreement includes a commitment to raising public awareness of climate change in schools and national development plans, among other items.

The timing of Sunday’s agreement does not bode well. The “Intended Nationally Determined Contributions” came two days after  Friday’s scheduled deadline, reportedly due to wrangling over details by factions split between rich and poor countries. 

Sunday’s announcement called the agreement “significant progress,” and in a nod to reality noted that adapting to climate change was raised to the same level of importance as acting to “to cut and curb emissions.”

Nations have “a far clearer vision of what the draft Paris agreement will look like as we head into 2015 and the next round of negotiations,” the release said, quoting Manuel Pulgar-Vidal,  Minister of the Environment of Peru and the COP President. It quoted other officials citing the “positivity” of the talks, and congratulating each other.

Some observers expressed optimism about the Lima agreement. “Negotiators found common ground on the most pressing issues,” said  Jennifer Morgan, Global Director, Climate Program, World Resources Institute, in a statement as the talks wrapped up Saturday. 

Whether the Lima talks have produced mere hot air, or substantive progress, may be determined next year in Paris. That is the next of a a long series of talks named after host cities, each marked by the effusive production of  lengthy documents full of long words, and until now followed by little or no action.

The Lima meeting was preceded by the fifth and most comprehensive report by the world body of climate experts.  It warned that climate change caused by humans will result in food shortages, mass extinctions and flooding, said the science is now 95 per cent conclusive, and that today’s climate change is unprecedented. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change said  that the world must act, together and immediately, on adaptation and mitigation, some changes are already inevitable, and said the risk of not acting is “extreme.”

For the Lima Accord to make a difference, citizens and governments worldwide will have to pay attention and act. Don’t hold your breath. The vague and wordy accord was buried by global news media even before its release, by  massive coverage of a stupid stunt by Greenpeace activists. The Greenpeace team defeated their message by damaging a 1,500-year-old World Heritage Site on the Nazca desert in Peru, which they trampled to create a sign visible from the air, “TIME FOR CHANGE!”

The Nazca culture is believed to have collapsed in about 750 AD. Experts theorize the Nazca people failed to adapt to climate change, having altered their landscape in ways that reduced resilience. 

— Deborah Jones

Participants at climate talks in Lima, at Plenaria-de-Cierre. Photo by H. Berninzon, © COP20

Participants at climate talks in Lima, at Plenaria-de-Cierre. Photo by H. Berninzon, © COP20

If you value our journalism, please help sustain us by buying a day pass or subscription. Facts and Opinions is an online journal of first-rate reporting and analysis, in words and images: choice journalism, without borders. Independent, non-partisan and employee-owned, F&O performs journalism for citizens, funded entirely by readers. We do not carry advertising or solicit donations from foundations or causes.

Click here to purchase a $1 day pass or subscription, from $2.95 per month to $19.95 annually. Subscribe by email using the form on the right to our free FRONTLINES blog. Find news in REPORTS; commentary, analysis, magazine and arts writing in OPINION/FEATURES, and image galleries in PHOTO-ESSAYS.  Follow us on Facebook and Twitter, and check our Contents page for regular updates.

 

Posted in Current Affairs Also tagged , , |