Why Putin Fears a President Clinton

TOM REGAN: SUMMONING ORENDA
October 15, 2016

Vladimir Putin, official photo

Vladimir Putin, official photo

For all of his and his lackeys’ denials, there seems little doubt that the hacking of emails from the U.S. Democratic National Committee, and Clinton advisor John Podesta, was carried out by Russians under the orders of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

As if the US needed more evidence that Mr. Putin wants to sway the election in favor of Republican candidate Donald Trump, there is this week’s statement by a longtime Putin ally –  known for voicing radical opinions to test reactions for Putin – that if Trump is not elected, there will be nuclear war.

“Relations between Russia and the United States can’t get any worse. The only way they can get worse is if a war starts,” Vladimir Zhirinovsky told a reporter from Reuters in his office on the 10th floor of Russia’s State Duma, or lower house of parliament.

“Americans voting for a president on Nov. 8 must realize that they are voting for peace on Planet Earth if they vote for Trump. But if they vote for Hillary it’s war. It will be a short movie. There will be Hiroshimas and Nagasakis everywhere.”

To quote my grandfather, horse hockey.

Before you continue: to our supporters, thank you. To newcomers, please know that reader-supported Facts and Opinions is employee-owned and ad-free. We continue only because readers like you pay at least 27 cents per story, on an honour system. Please contribute below, or find more payment options here.

Yes, things are bad between the two countries at the moment, primarily over Syria and the Ukraine. The email hacking, and attempts to disrupt American voting systems, don’t help. But Putin is trying to take advantage of the space left by the end of one administration and the beginning of another to create as much chaos as he can. Creating chaos is the one thing he can do effectively, because the truth is that Russia is not the military power Putin boasts about, and he knows it.

So why work so hard to elect Trump? There are several theories.

  • Putin believes the Obama administration, and Clinton in particular, helped orchestrate the protests against him during the 2011 Russian presidential elections, and going after Clinton is pay back.
  • There is  the statement Clinton made in the early 2000s about Putin. When then-President George W. Bush said he looked into the eyes of Putin and saw his soul, then-Senator Clinton said that was impossible because Putin, a former KGB agent, didn’t have a soul. Like Trump, Putin never forgets a slight.
  • Another strategy being suggested is that Putin knows Trump can be easily handled. A little flattery here and there, and Putin could get most of what he wants from Trump.

But I believe there is another reason that Putin wants Trump to win. He’s terrified of Clinton.

Clinton has shown little inclination to buy into the PR machine that is the ego of Vladimir Putin, such as his bare-chested bear-fighting calendars and his scoring multiple goals while playing against seasoned Russian hockey stars. It’s easy to see that Clinton sees it all for the baloney that it is. Clinton is also not some newbie on the world stage. As secretary of state, she has clashed with Putin before and has a much better measure of him than does Trump, who barely takes time to learn about anything that is not about him.

No doubt the idea was that by giving hacked emails to WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange, who hates Clinton for entirely different reasons, the Russians would help kill Clinton’s candidacy. But Putin didn’t count on two things.

First, the emails are not all that damaging. They are more the “inside’ baseball of the Clinton campaign. Time magazine’s Joe Klein, no friend of the Clintons and author of  the book Primary Colors, a fictionalized account of her husband Bill’s presidential campaign, said the mail shows her to be, well, a normal politician, which he wrote was “reassuring in this crazy election.”

A Washington Post editorial (and remember the Post’s opinion and editorial section is moderately conservative) wrote that the leaked emails showed her to be (gasp!) “reasonable.”

But even Putin could not know that Donald Trump’s past indiscretions and alleged sexual assaults would blow up to swamp coverage of every other issue. Even if the leaks had been truly bad for the Clinton campaign, it is doubtful that most people, other than Trump’s true believers, paid any solid attention. As each new woman comes forward to allege that Trump sexually assaulted her, the hacked emails retreat farther and farther into the background noise of the campaign.

In the end, Putin will have to deal with Clinton. And it’s my guess that after all he’s done to do in her candidacy, she won’t be in a mood to fool around with Russia.

Clinton won’t be stupid – her advocacy of a no-fly zone in Syria was done more to spook Putin than to actually institute one – but she will be tough. Putin will have to face the fact that he won’t get want he wants as easily as he thought he could.

 

Copyright Tom Regan 2016

Contact Tom Regan:  motnager@gmail.com

LINKS

US finds growing evidence Russia feeding emails to WikiLeaks
http://www.cnn.com/2016/10/13/politics/russia-us-election/

Why the Russian Hacks of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Should Reassure Us All
Why the Russian Hacks of Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Should Reassure Us All

Vladimir Putin’s Bad Blood With Hillary Clinton
Vladimir Putin’s Bad Blood With Hillary Clinton

Scandal! WikiLeaks reveals Hillary Clinton to be . . . reasonable
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/scandal-wikileaks-reveals-hillary-clinton-to-be–reasonable/2016/10/10/bbad509c-8f19-11e6-9c52-0b10449e33c4_story.html?utm_term=.7668018fbcc8

 

~~~

 

Tom Regan Tom Regan has worked for the Canadian Broadcasting Corporation and with the National Film Board in Canada, and in the United States for the Christian Science Monitor, Boston Globe, and National Public Radio. A former executive director of the Online News Association in the U.S., he was a Nieman fellow at Harvard in 1991-92. He is based near Washington, D.C.

Return to Tom Regan’s page 

 

 ~~~

Facts and Opinions is a boutique journal of reporting and analysis in words and images, without borders. Independent, non-partisan and employee-owned, F&O is funded only by you, our readers. We are ad-free and spam-free, and do not solicit donations from partisan organizations. To continue we need a minimum payment of .27 for one story, or a sustaining donation. Visit our Subscribe page for details, or donate below. With enough supporters each paying a small amount, we will continue, and increase our original works like this.

F&O’s CONTENTS page is updated each Saturday. Sign up for emailed announcements of new work on our free FRONTLINES blog; find evidence-based reporting in Reports; commentary, analysis and creative non-fiction in OPINION-FEATURES; and image galleries in PHOTO-ESSAYS. If you value journalism please support F&O, and tell others about us.